{"id":107114,"date":"2017-09-12T08:53:26","date_gmt":"2017-09-12T08:53:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/?p=107114"},"modified":"2017-09-12T08:53:26","modified_gmt":"2017-09-12T08:53:26","slug":"ofcom-finds-channel-4-news-in-breach-of-code","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/blog\/ofcom-finds-channel-4-news-in-breach-of-code\/","title":{"rendered":"Ofcom finds Channel 4 News in breach of code"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>Ofcom has found Channel 4 News in \u2018serious breach\u2019 of the broadcasting code. The episode in question, broadcast on 22 March, wrongly identified Abu Izzadeen as the Westminster terror attacker.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>As reported in the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/uk-news\/2017\/sep\/11\/channel-4-news-condemned-by-ofcom-for-westminster-attack-blunder\" target=\"_blank\">Guardian<\/a>, Channel 4 News has also been criticised for a string of other major mistakes in recent years, including:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>A 2014 news report covering the publication of the Ellison review in to possible corruption and the role of undercover policing in the Metropolitan police in the Stephen Lawrence case. Short interview clips with five supposedly random members of the public asking whether they trusted the police turned out to all be from the same organisation, with which the reporter had links.<\/li>\n<li>A 2014 report on Russia\u2019s assertive military and foreign policy that included an audio clip supposedly of an RAF pilot intercepting and warning a Russian military plane in British airspace. It turned out to be an intercept of a Latvian cargo plane.<\/li>\n<li>A 2015 report into the aftermath of the Shoreham air show crash reported the names of two members of the public that had died before their deaths had been officially confirmed.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This latest error has led the media regulator to rule that Channel 4 must broadcast Ofcom\u2019s investigation result \u2013 a rare move against a national broadcaster.<\/p>\n<p>A spokesperson for Ofcom <a href=\"http:\/\/www.pressgazette.co.uk\/channel-4-news-condemned-by-ofcom-over-fourth-accuracy-breach-in-three-years-after-it-named-wrong-man-as-westminster-terror-attacker\/\" target=\"_blank\">told journalists<\/a>: \u2018This is the fourth time in three years we have found Channel 4 in breach of its requirement to report news with due accuracy. We are particularly concerned that another serious breach has happened, given Channel 4\u2019s previous assurances to Ofcom that improvements to its compliance processes were being made.<\/p>\n<p>\u2018Considering the seriousness of this breach, we are requiring Channel 4 News to air a summary of our breach decision.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>The wrongful accusation was corrected on air but this was not enough to avoid the more dramatic ruling.<\/p>\n<p>Channel 4 said: \u2018We note that Ofcom acknowledges Channel 4 News made appropriate corrections while on air; removed the programme from other platforms and carried a full correction and apology the following day.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>Channel 4 news has accepted the ruling, a statement said: \u2018Channel 4 News takes its obligations under the Ofcom Broadcasting Code extremely seriously and is committed to providing audiences with high-quality, accurate and impartial news programming. We have participated fully in Ofcom\u2019s investigation and note the regulator\u2019s ruling which takes into account the immediate steps taken to correct and clarify the error during the course of the programme.\u2019<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Ofcom has found Channel 4 News in \u2018serious breach\u2019 of the broadcasting code. The episode in question, broadcast on 22 March, wrongly identified Abu Izzadeen as the Westminster terror attacker.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":423,"featured_media":89409,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0,"footnotes":""},"categories":[350,3729],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107114"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/423"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=107114"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107114\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":107179,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/107114\/revisions\/107179"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/89409"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=107114"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=107114"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.vuelio.com\/uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=107114"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}